It appears to be like like AH’s attorneys have been deceptive in what they informed the press.
The summons the juror acquired contained his authorized identify, authorized tackle, and did NOT comprise a beginning date. Any implication the summons contained a beginning date is unfaithful and deceptive.
Additionally, he was totally vetted by the court docket, questioned upfront by AH’s attorneys in addition to permitted.
The decide famous AH’s crew knew of any points earlier than the beginning of the trial and did not object.
It seems they’re going for sowing doubt with the press and attempting to undermine the decision. And know they haven’t any shot at an attraction.
