This text is extremely silly. The lawyer is clearly pandering in direction of a selected crowd, contemplating he is talking out of his ass—other than him being fairly actually a random lawyer, he stated this might occur within the UK resulting from “goal proof” that she’s edited photographs. However there is no proof of that. It was defined quite explicitly inside the trial that the metadata of her photographs present that it was run by way of Photos3, a fundamental picture app for the iPhone that may solely actually copy photographs and put filters over them. It isn’t complicated sufficient to drastically distort the picture or create one thing new, like add bruises that weren’t there beforehand.
Additionally, when Depp appealed his lawsuit within the UK, the court docket of appeals reviewed the proof then. They additionally discovered that there was substantial proof displaying Depp had abused her. When 2+ judges have rereviewed the proof within the UK they usually each got here to the identical conclusion, that is that. Nothing goes to come back out of this within the UK. That is simply low tier pandering
