X/@kayleighmcenany
The manipulated footage portrayed events from New York City that showed protesters blocking a woman on her way to work. The woman is visibly angry and pleading with the protesters, “What about my kid?” while trying to get through the blockade. The protesters laughed and refused to let her pass, triggering a wave of outrage online.
Advertisement
Instantly, outrage erupted over the video, with many condemning the protesters for obstructing a normal citizen who was merely trying to go about her daily business. One person asked if this was even legal because surely the right to protest does not confer others from impeding one’s free movement. Another said it was “false imprisonment” ad hoc and that the lady should have kept driving.
🚨WATCH: Protesters try to stop a mother from getting to work.
“What about my kid!?” she implores. pic.twitter.com/k1QSA6uu4K
— Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) June 11, 2025
Some actually stated that this was part of the process as disturbances are meant to be caused by protesting at any time. Other commenters sarcastically brushed off the outrage by stating that “delays on the New York City highways are not news” while most others were venting out frustration, demanding arrests for highway blocking without permits.
Race soon became the main center of discussion. The woman in the video posed the very same question- “why are those white protesters stopping me from working?”-to divergent responses. Some accused her of playing the race card, while others sympathized with her, saying that the actions of the protesters go against everything they purportedly stand for when it comes to oppressed groups.
Beyond being the incubator for discourse sprung by the very occasion, the debate also cascaded into discussions on how protests should be. A user opined that these were not peaceful protests but riots against law enforcement and the ordinary American. Another comment basically suggested Congress should conduct an inquiry into who funds and organizes these disturbances.
Many tried to find some semblance of a middle ground within the ongoing debate, with some saying that protests are important but innocent bystanders should not start bearing the brunt; however, the expression that would prevail was that of frustration-an expression directed at the protesters, the police for not intervening, or the whole thing becoming politicized.
Advertisement
Undoubtedly, McEnany ran her dagger right into the heart of the larger civil disobedience conversation, individual rights, and question about where one draws the line when activism starts trespassing on daily life. The video is called yet another flashpoint in an already heavily polarized atmosphere-fast becoming the next political battleground, where even commuting becomes an affair.
