EXCLUSIVE: A outstanding Scottish MP is making an attempt to dam former Tradition Secretary Nadine Dorries’ path to the Home of Lords over her controversial declare that Channel 4 used actors in Love Productions’ actuality format Tower Block of Commons.
John Nicolson, who sits on the influential Digital, Tradition, Media & Sport Committee (DCMSC) and famously grilled Dorries over Tower Block of Commons in Might, has written to Home of Lords Appointments Fee Chair Lord Bew and referred the matter to the UK’s Commons Committee of Privileges. Deadline has seen the letter.
Nicolson argues that Dorries’ knowingly misled a parliamentary committee together with her “seemingly completely false” declare and due to this fact shouldn’t be allowed to enter the Home of Lords. The previous I’m a Movie star… Get Me Out of Right here! contestant stepped down as Tradition Secretary earlier this week and is anticipated to be given a peerage.
In July, Channel 4 and Tower Block of Commons producer Love investigated Dorries’ feedback that the individuals who took half within the format had been “probably not dwelling in a flat” and “had been truly actors,” concluding there was “no proof to help the allegations made concerning the programme.”
Others who took half within the present 12 years in the past, a social experiment format that noticed MPs akin to Dorries dwell in disadvantaged UK housing estates, have publicly refuted her claims.
Nicolson’s letter to Bew requested that any choice on [Dorries’] appointment to the Lords be delayed till the Commons Committee of Privileges takes a choice on whether or not to analyze after which rule on this critical matter.”
“If Ms. Dorries’ claims are substantiated her appointment can proceed,” added Nicolson. “But when Channel 4’s investigation stays unchallenged by proof, will probably be clear that the Secretary of State has misled a Commons Choose Committee and can thus be an inappropriate individual to be advisable by the Prime Minister for a peerage.”
Nicolson described Dorries’ account as “seeming to be completely false” and stated the matter is of “nice significance as she is attacking the credibility of Channel 4 – a broadcaster which she plans to privatise in a extremely controversial transfer.”
Dorries has beforehand doubled down on her claims. Responding to the DCMSC chair in July, she stated she had “set out my very own experiences of participating within the programme and stand by these remarks.”
Throughout her year-long Tradition Secretary stint, Dorries rubberstamped laws to promote Channel 4, a transfer opposed by 96% of respondents to the federal government session and proven by polling to be backside of Conservative voter priorities. Her division was additionally accused by Channel 4 CEO Alex Mahon of making an attempt to change the wording of its annual report back to make the Nice British Bake Off community seem much less financially sustainable.
Dorries’ substitute Michelle Donelan should now resolve whether or not to push on with privatization or reverse the coverage.
Deadline has reached out to Dorries’ workplace for remark.
![Thing Is [Spoiler], Is He Dead?](https://tvline.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/wednesday-season-2-finale-ending-explained.jpg?w=650 "Thing Is [Spoiler], Is He Dead?")
