It annoys me when headline writers cannot get fundamental authorized details proper. No, the jury didn’t decide that Kevin Spacey did not molest Anthony Rapp. That was by no means what the jury was tasked to do. They decided that plaintiff’s counsel did not meet the usual of proof to carry Spacey liable in a civil case. It is the identical method jurors in a prison case do not discover a defendant “harmless”; they discover them “not responsible.”
There are any variety of higher methods to jot down that concisely. “Kevin Spacey discovered not responsible for battery in Anthony Rapp case,” “Kevin Spacey discovered not liable in intercourse abuse go well with introduced by Anthony Rapp,” and “Kevin Spacey discovered not liable in intercourse abuse case, jury guidelines” are all higher examples discovered from a fast Google search. I am not providing any opinion on the deserves of the case right here; I am simply saying get the essential details straight.
Edit: Simply to make clear, that is no dig on the OP. They’re simply relating what the AP headline author wrote.
